Haggin writes, “Ad-buyers said the ads on the alternate site weren’t worth what they paid because they reached a different audience and appeared on overcrowded pages.
“When brands bought some of the ads, it was with the understanding that they would appear on Forbes.com, according to Adalytics, an ad-research firm that shared its findings with the Journal.
“Forbes blamed Media.net, an ad-tech company that manages Forbes’s ad-bidding software, for the misrepresentation, and said it only affected a small share of overall ad impressions. Forbes also disputed the notion that it operated an alternate site, which it described as a ‘subdomain.’ “
“Because the subdomain ‘represents a very small part of Forbes’ user base and an insignificant part of our overall business, we’ve decided to shut it down,’ a spokeswoman said Tuesday. Forbes said Adalytics didn’t give it access to review the research report.”
Read more here.
Josh Witt, a reporter at the Wichita Business Journal, is leaving the American City Business…
Business Insider has named Jack Sommers its interim UK bureau chief. He has been a deputy editor…
WFMZ-TV is seeking a dynamic Business Reporter with a passion for reporting and an ability…
CNBC is throwing its weight behind its nascent CNBC Sport brand, bringing its sports business coverage to…
Ken Bensinger of The New York Times writes about how right-leaning media organizations have not emphasized…
Reuters tech reporter Raphael Satter has sued the Indian government after his Indian overseas citizenship was cancelled,…