Laurel Deppen of Louisville Business First writes, “The case initially began when Zillow Inc., a Seattle-based technology real estate marketplace, argued that it shouldn’t be charged a commercial fee for records from the Property Value Administrator offices in Kentucky because other entities, specifically news organizations, collect and publish the same data and are charged a minimum cost.
“LBF in the past has used such information in building our most expensive real estate transactions lists for a given year, which is an editorial product.
“Zillow, as a commercial enterprise, asked the court to strike down a provision of the Open Records Act that allowed PVAs to charge it commercial fees. Attorneys for Zillow argued that it was unconstitutional to discriminate between Zillow and a business journal, for example.
“The judge in the case, Gregory Van Tatenhove, ruled that each entity should pay the commercial fees, said Michael Abate, of Louisville-based Kaplan Johnson Abate & Bird. Abate is representing ACBJ and KPA in the case. KPA intervened after the court’s initial ruling and disagrees with the court’s decision.”
Read more here.
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…