Steven Yount, the president of the union that represents business journalists at The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones Newswires, Barron’s and Marketwatch, writes on Salon.com about why Dow Jones & Co. should not be sold to News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch.
Yount wrote, “I’m a newscaster for the Wall Street Journal Radio Network and the president of the union local that represents 2,000 Dow Jones employees, including its rank-and-file journalists throughout North America. I believe our members’ interests are best served by adherence to the principle of editorial independence within a company whose only mission is reporting the news. As journalists and union members we see no upside in reducing Dow Jones to a tiny appendage of a global conglomerate with financial, political and regulatory interests alien to what we do.
“But this is not just a sentimental attachment to fearless and independent journalism. No one looks at business with clearer eyes than the reporters and editors at Dow Jones. Because many of us are shareholders too, we would even make some quick money off the sale. Yet we think the takeover is bad business. Not just bad for journalism, bad for readers, bad for advertisers, but bad for the long-term interest of shareholders, most of all the Bancrofts.”
OLD Media Moves
Don't sell my company to Rupert Murdoch
July 23, 2007
Posted by Chris Roush
Steven Yount, the president of the union that represents business journalists at The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones Newswires, Barron’s and Marketwatch, writes on Salon.com about why Dow Jones & Co. should not be sold to News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch.
Yount wrote, “I’m a newscaster for the Wall Street Journal Radio Network and the president of the union local that represents 2,000 Dow Jones employees, including its rank-and-file journalists throughout North America. I believe our members’ interests are best served by adherence to the principle of editorial independence within a company whose only mission is reporting the news. As journalists and union members we see no upside in reducing Dow Jones to a tiny appendage of a global conglomerate with financial, political and regulatory interests alien to what we do.
“But this is not just a sentimental attachment to fearless and independent journalism. No one looks at business with clearer eyes than the reporters and editors at Dow Jones. Because many of us are shareholders too, we would even make some quick money off the sale. Yet we think the takeover is bad business. Not just bad for journalism, bad for readers, bad for advertisers, but bad for the long-term interest of shareholders, most of all the Bancrofts.”
Read more here.
Media News
WSJ’s Tucker: Gershkovich shows importance of free press
March 28, 2024
Media News
Read-a-thon recognizes one year in jail for WSJ’s Gershkovich
March 28, 2024
Media News
Rosen departs Business Insider for a new opportunity
March 28, 2024
Media News
Why Evan Gershkovich’s case is so important
March 28, 2024
Media News
Taylor joins Bloomberg’s municipal finance team
March 28, 2024
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.